We can check whether or not you’re going to get an execution plan for this in two easy ways. You can capture the estimated plan, or run the query and capture the actual plan. Since most of the time, it’s preferable to work with the added runtime information that an actual plan provides, let’s start there. However, if you execute the query above and try to capture an actual plan, you will not get one. So, let’s capture the estimated plan instead. Here’s what we see:
Not much of a plan really.
Read on for that, and start holding your breath for a new execution plans book.
There are different types of SRAM. High-performance SRAM has 6 transistors, 6T. Intel may use 8T Intel Labs at ISSCC 2012 or even 10T for low power? (see real world tech NTV). It would seem that SRAM should be about six times less dense than DRAM, depending on the number of transistors in SRAM, and the size of the capacitor in DRAM.
There is a Micron slide in Micro 48 Keynote III that says SRAM does not scale on manufacturing process as well as DRAM. Instead of 6:1, or 0.67Gbit SRAM at the same die size as 4Gbit DRAM, it might be 40:1, implying 100Mbit in equal area? Another source says 100:1 might be appropriate.
Eye-balling the Intel Broadwell 10-core (LCC) die, the L3 cache is 50mm2, listed as 25MB. It includes tags and ECC on both data and tags? There could be 240Mb or more in the 25MB L3? Then 1G could fit in a 250mm2 die, plus area for the signals going off-die.
There is a lot of depth in this blog post.
Here’s the Connect Item involved – written by Michael Swart.
Trace flag 2390 can cause large compile time when dealing with filtered indexes. (Active)
Huh. “What does that have to do with clustered columnstore indexes?” you might ask. No, really, it’d be a personal favor if you *did* ask…
Ask and then read on. This is the kind of post I’d send to someone wanting to learn how to troubleshoot issues.
In this module you will learn how to use the Sankey Bar Chart Power BI Custom Visual. The Sankey Bar Chart is used to show a flow of data between different stages of a process.
It’s an interesting mix of sankey, bar chart, and funnel. In other words, you may only have one thing you can use it for, but it’ll be a really good use.
One workaround is to create it in model. Then it will be in tempdb on restart, but it will also be in all the databases you create.
That may or may not have the intended effect! If you don’t want people doing a certain thing in just tempdb, you have to add an additional check using the event data.
Click through for more details, including a couple of sample scripts.
What we’re going to do is delete the database files whilst the instance is up and running. Something you can’t do to a database running in an instance of SQL on windows as the files are locked.
Click through for the results, which are counter-intuitive for Windows admins, as well as the reason for this behavior.
Problem happens when you want a Text field to be ordered based on something different than the value of the field. For example if you look at above chart you can see that months ordered from April to September. This is not order of months, this is alphabetical order. If you change the sorting of visual, it will only change it from A to Z, or Z to A. To make it in the order of month numbers you have to do it differently.
Read on for the solution.
When I worked at the Port of Virginia, I was a little less experienced in SQL and didn’t notice this lovely little option. I of course failed to set it. Can anyone guess what happened? YEP, we got low on resources in the wee hours of the morning and SQL kicked off an Error 017-Insufficient Resources. Thousands of emails were generated and caused the Exchange server to go down as well as some other issues that arose because of this. The worst part is that all the emails had to finish processing before we could delete them from the system. I think when all was said and done there was well over 250k messages it created.
She also includes a list of important alerts; just make sure to set the delay.
Two of these requests have Connect items, which I’m listing below. The first allows you to change the location of Query Store data to reside somewhere in the user database besides the PRIMARY filegroup:
The other request is related to exporting that data, which is technically possible now, but it’s not a supported method so it’s not something I really want to implement in a client environment. I’ve had many people describe their process for testing which includes restoring database nightly. If they’re using Query Store as part of testing, that data is lost every night by the restore.
Click through for more and vote up those items relevant to you.
The Connect Item I have chosen to write about is an old one and is about getting Intellisense for MDX in SQL Server Management Studio [SSMS]. Despite the fact that it was created back in 2009 by Jamie Thomson (b|l|t), it is still active and there has been a public acknowledgement back then, by the Analysis Service Team, that they will consider this request for an upcoming release. 2009, still active… True story.
Read on for more details and be sure to join Jens’s quixotic quest if you’d like to see MDX Intellisense.