Getting A Handle On Isolation Levels

Robert Bishop explains some of the basics behind transaction isolation levels:

Lost Updates

It is possible for two or more transactions to modify the same row. While the subsequent transactions are reading the data, the 1st transaction commits its changes. Then the subsequent transaction makes its changes and commits, thereby possibly losing the changes committed by the 1st transaction. In this scenario, the last transaction always wins.

Dirty Read

A dirty read is when a SELECT statement will read against a table that is currently being modified and not yet committed to the database. By default, SQL Server will protect against this on all isolation levels, except for Read Uncommitted or by using NOLOCK in your queries.

This is the first in a series.

Related Posts

Thoughts On Exclusive Locks

Louis Davidson shares some thoughts on exclusive locks in SQL Server: You will find that the SELECT statement executes, ignoring the exclusive lock, because it is not a write lock, and the data on the page has not been changed.The main reason people try to do this is to force access to a row in […]

Read More

Tempdb Blocking With Non-Clustered Columnstore Indexes

Ned Otter runs into a tricky issue: I have a client that used Itzik Ben-Gan’s solution of creating a filtered nonclustered columnstore index to achieve batch mode on a rowstore (in fact I proposed that the client consider it). They have an OLTP system, and often perform YTD calculations. When they tested, processing time was reduced by […]

Read More

Categories

January 2017
MTWTFSS
« Dec Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031