NoSQL? No! MoSQL

Steve Jones points out a bit of a shift at Google:


Google is doing more SQL, or at least shifting towards relational SQL databases as a way of storing data. At least, some of their engineers see this as a better way to store data for many problems. Since I’m a relational database advocate, I found this to be interesting.
When Google first started to publish information on BigTable and other new ways of dealing with large amounts of data, I felt that these weren’t solutions I’d use or problems that many people had. The idea of Map Reduce is interesting and certainly applicable to the problem space Google had of a global database of sites, but that’s not a problem I’ve ever encountered. Instead, most of the struggles I’ve had with relational systems are still better addressed in a relational system.

Read the whole thing.  Note that this is slightly different than Feasel’s Law, as Steve is focusing more on the consistency side of things rather than the interface.

Also, just going to leave this here:

Related Posts

Contrasting Oracle’s Architecture with SQL Server’s

Kellyn Pot’vin-Gorman helps us understand where Oracle’s architecture differs from SQL Server’s: The first thing you’ll notice is what Oracle refers to as an INSTANCE is different to what SQL Server calls one. Oracle’s instance is most closely related to what SQL Server calls their database, (although it includes the files that Oracle includes in […]

Read More

Sizing Azure SQL Database

Arun Sirpal takes us through finding the right size for Azure SQL Database: Do you want to identify the correct Service Tier and Compute Size ( was once known as performance level) for your Azure SQL Database? How would you go about it? Would you use the DTU (Database Transaction Unit) calculator? What about the […]

Read More

Categories

December 2018
MTWTFSS
« Nov Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31