Rohan Kotwani gives us an example where KernelML might be better than TensorFlow or PyTorch:

So what’s the point of using KernelML?1. The parameters in each layer can be non-linear

2. Each parameter can be sampled from a different random distribution

3. The parameters can be transformed to meet certain constraints

4. Network combinations are defined in terms of numpy operations

5. Parameters are probabilistically updated

6. Each parameter update samples the loss function around a local or global minima

KerneML SpecsKernelMLis brute force optimizer that can be used to train machine learning algorithms. The package uses a combination of a machine learning and monte carlo simulations to optimize a parameter vector with a user defined loss function. Using kernelml creates a high computational cost for large complex networks because it samples the loss function using a subspace for each parameter in the parameter vector which requires many random simulations. The computational cost was reduced by enabling parallel computations with the

ipyparallel. The decision to use this package was made because it effectively utilizes the cores on a machine.

It’s an interesting use case, though I would have liked to have seen a direct comparison to other frameworks.