Defending Pie Charts

Bobby Johnson makes a valiant effort at defending the indefensible:

In the world of data analysis, there are few things more reviled than the pie chart. Among “serious” data people, it is at best trivial and naive, and at worst downright evil.

I do not agree with this. The pie chart is simple, but that is its beauty. It does exactly one thing and it does it well: it shows you how much different parts contribute to a whole. This isn’t the only question you ever have about your data, but when it’s the question you do have, the pie chart is perfect. That is not evil and it is not naive. It is data visualization doing what it should: taking something large and abstract and saying something simple about it that your brain can easily internalize.

I strongly disagree with arguments in the article, but do respect the attempt.  In each of the cases, at least one of a bar chart, stacked 100% bar chart, or dot plot could give at least the same amount of information with less lower mental overhead.

Related Posts

Telling a Story When Data is Always Changing

Meagan Longoria explains how you can tell a story with data when the data is not static: If you are a BI/report developer, you know this challenge well. You may follow all the guidelines: choose a good color palette, make visuals that highlight the important data points, get rid of clutter. But what happens when […]

Read More

Finding Dependency Clusters

Michael J. Swart performs cluster analysis with tables: That ball of mush in the middle is hard to look at, but the smaller disconnected bits aren’t! Just like Ben, I want to work on those smaller pieces too! And just like the lonely tables we looked at last week, these small isolated components are also good […]

Read More


March 2018
« Feb Apr »