Looping In Python And R

Kevin Feasel


Python, R

Dmitry Kisler has a quick comparison of looping speed in Python and R:

This post is about R versus Python in terms of the time they require to loop and generate pseudo-random numbers. To accomplish the task, the following steps were performed in Python and R (1) loop 100k times (ii is the loop index) (2) generate a random integer number out of the array of integers from 1 to the current loop index ii (ii+1 for Python) (3) output elapsed time at the probe loop steps: ii (ii+1 for Python) in [10, 100, 1000, 5000, 10000, 25000, 50000, 75000, 100000]

The findings were mostly unsurprising to me, though there was one unexpected twist.

Related Posts

Defining Tidy Data

John Mount shares thoughts about the concept of tidy data: A question is: is such a data set “tidy”? The paper itself claims the above definitions are “Codd’s 3rd normal form.” So, no the above table is not “tidy” under that paper’s definition. The the winner’s date of birth is a fact about the winner […]

Read More

Visualizing Earthquake Data

Giorgio Garziano continues a series on analyzing earthquake data: This is the third part of our post series about the exploratory analysis of a publicly available dataset reporting earthquakes and similar events within a specific 30 days time span. In this post, we are going to show static, interactive and animated earthquakes maps of different flavors by […]

Read More


February 2018
« Jan Mar »