Kevin Gessner explains some caching concepts used at Etsy:
A major drawback of modulo hashing is that the size of the cache pool needs to be stable over time. Changing the size of the cache pool will cause most cache keys to hash to a new server. Even though the values are still in the cache, if the key is distributed to a different server, the lookup will be a miss. That makes changing the size of the cache pool—to make it larger or for maintenance—an expensive and inefficient operation, as performance will suffer under tons of spurious cache misses.
For instance, if you have a pool of 4 hosts, a key that hashes to
500 will be stored on pool member
500 % 4 == 0, while a key that hashes to
1299 will be stored on pool member
1299 % 4 == 3. If you grow your cache by adding a fifth host, the cache pool calculated for each key may change. The key that hashed to
500 will still be found on pool member
500 % 5 == 0, but the key that hashed to
1299 be on pool member
1299 % 5 == 4. Until the new pool member is warmed up, your cache hit rate will suffer, as the cache data will suddenly be on the ‘wrong’ host. In some cases, pool changes can cause more than half of your cached data to be assigned to a different host, slashing the efficiency of the cache temporarily. In the case of going from 4 to 5 hosts, only 20% of cache keys will be on the same host as before!
It’s interesting reading.