Press "Enter" to skip to content

Day: January 15, 2026

Thoughts on the Death of the DBA

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Rebecca Lewis presses X to doubt:

Every few years, something comes along that’s definitively, no-questions-asked going to replace us.

Let’s review the historical record.

Rebecca points out a half-dozen instances in which people have decried the end of the DBA role, and yet it’s still there somehow… And honestly, you could probably find a half-dozen more examples without searching too hard, like how SQL Server 2000 was going to render DBAs obsolete because of its self-management capabilities. Which, admittedly, is very similar to the 1996 Oracle announcement.

Leave a Comment

MinIO Alternatives

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Robin Moffatt looks for alternatives:

In late 2025 the company behind MinIO decided to abandon it to pursue other commercial interests. As well as upsetting a bunch of folk, it also put the cat amongst the pigeons of many software demos that relied on MinIO to emulate S3 storage locally, not to mention build pipelines that used it for validating S3 compatibility.

In this blog post I’m going to look at some alternatives to MinIO.

Read on for Robin’s analysis of a half-dozen alternatives.

Leave a Comment

Defining Applications in Power BI and Microsoft Fabric

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Andy Brownsword deploys an app:

When using Power BI or Fabric workspaces to browse reports, we’re greeted with a list of items and their attributes. While attention is given to report visuals such as bars, pies, candles, and RAG highlights, the surrounding experience is neglected. When it comes to consumption, the standard interface falls short.

Apps fill this gap. They’ve been around in Power BI for a while, but with the additional layers that come with Fabric, the need for a clean way to present content is increasingly valuable.

Read on to learn about more functionality around apps and how you can set them up in Fabric/Power BI.

Leave a Comment

Lessons Learned in a SQL Server 2025 Upgrade

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Aaron Bertrand shares some lessons learned:

We recently upgraded multiple systems to SQL Server 2025. The engine upgrade itself was smooth, but three unexpected issues surfaced in our lower environments as we planned out production. None of these issues prevented the upgrade from completing, but all three could easily derail an otherwise smooth in-place upgrade to SQL Server 2025. What were these issues, and how can you avoid hitting them?

My biggest surprise out of this is that full-text search actually got upgraded.

Leave a Comment

Indexes and COUNT() in SQL Server

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Louis Davidson does some testing:

A few weeks ago, there was a LinkedIn post (I can’t find it anymore) that covered something about how indexes were used by COUNT in SQL. I think it may have been based on SQL Server, but I am not sure (it is rare that one of the SQL posts on LinkedIn mentions a platform). At the time, I went and tried a few of the mentioned cases and realized this was an interesting question: how does the COUNT aggregate use indexes when you use various different expressions.

Louis has a series of test cases and I got most of them right, though I wasn’t sure about one particular optimization.

Leave a Comment

SQL ConstantCare Population Report for Q4 2025

Published 2026-01-15 by Kevin Feasel

Brent Ozar has an update:

It’s time for our quarterly update of our SQL ConstantCare® population report, showing how quickly (or slowly) folks adopt new versions of SQL Server. In short, people are replacing SQL Server 2016 and 2017 with 2022!

I do think that 2025 will pick up steam. The marginal change was mostly into 2022, but 2025 wasn’t officially released until November and I’m guessing not many companies upgraded in December. I do think we’ll see some pickup of SQL Server 2025 in this quarter.

As always, this is my throat-clearing reminder that what Brent has is a biased sample of the SQL Server population and is not necessarily reflective of the population as a whole. It’s a very interesting sample upon which to reflect, but its specific bias is that it necessarily only includes customers of Brent Ozar’s service, which will be a specific subset of organizations.

Leave a Comment