Blocking A Truncate Statement

Arun Sirpal shows that the TRUNCATE command needs to take locks like any other data modification command:

The truncate option is fast and efficient but did you know that it takes a certain lock where you could actually be blocked?

What am I talking about? When you issue a truncate it takes a Sch-M lock and it uses this when it is moving the allocation units to the deferred drop queue. So if it takes this lock and you look at the locking compatibility matrix below you will see what can cause a conflict (C).

Arun includes an image which shows what can block what, and also shows us an example.

Related Posts

Thoughts On Exclusive Locks

Louis Davidson shares some thoughts on exclusive locks in SQL Server: You will find that the SELECT statement executes, ignoring the exclusive lock, because it is not a write lock, and the data on the page has not been changed.The main reason people try to do this is to force access to a row in […]

Read More

Tempdb Blocking With Non-Clustered Columnstore Indexes

Ned Otter runs into a tricky issue: I have a client that used Itzik Ben-Gan’s solution of creating a filtered nonclustered columnstore index to achieve batch mode on a rowstore (in fact I proposed that the client consider it). They have an OLTP system, and often perform YTD calculations. When they tested, processing time was reduced by […]

Read More

Categories

August 2018
MTWTFSS
« Jul Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031