Smarter Indexes Based On Column Cardinality

Eric Blinn has a function which organizes columns in the missing index DMV by cardinality:

Bryan Rebok and Brent Ozar recently opened my eyes to something I didn’t know.  When SQL Server recommends missing indexes to you it puts the columns in order in which they are found in the table.  That’s it.  I always thought there was more logic into it.  But there isn’t.  Upon reading this I had a terrible realization that I’ve made a lot of awful indexes in my time.  I owe the world an apology.  I hope this post can serve as that apology.

I’ve written a function that accepts the equality column list from dm_db_missing_index_details as a parameter and spits those columns back out in order by their cardinality.  This won’t necessarily be the proper order for the columns in every index, but it is far more likely to be correct than the initial result from the DMV.

I’m amazed that the missing index DMV generates column names in such a simplistic manner.

Related Posts

Finding Missing Index Hints in Query Store

Grant Fritchey shows us another place where we can find missing index hints: A couple of notes on the query. I cast the query_plan as xml so that I can use the XQuery to pull out the information. It is possible that the plan might be so large that you get an error because of […]

Read More

Benefits of Inline Indexes

Phil Factor covers a topic fairly close to my heart: Usually, the added features of the CREATE TABLE syntax in new releases of SQL Server are esoteric, and unless you are dealing with memory-optimized tables or other esoteric stuff, they aren’t of great interest. However, the Inline INDEX for both a table and column index […]

Read More

Categories

June 2018
MTWTFSS
« May Jul »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930