Loops Versus Apply: Speed Comparison

Kevin Feasel

2018-02-19

R

Mike Spencer compares lapply (single core and its multi-core version) versus a for loop in R:

But how fast were they? Can we get faster? Thankfully R provides `system.time()` for timing code execution. In order to get faster, it makes sense to use all the processing power our machines have. The ‘parallel’ library has some great tools to help us run our jobs in parallel and take advantage of multicore processing. My favourite is `mclapply()`, because it is very very easy to take an `lapply` and make it multicore. Note that mclapply doesn’t work on Windows. The following script runs the `read_clean_write()` function in a for loop (boo, hiss), lapply and mclapply. I’ve run these as list elements to make life easier later on.

It’s interesting reading, particularly because I had expected lapply to do a little bit better.  Also interesting is the relative overhead cost of mclapply in this scenario:  going from 1 core to 4 cut the time to approximately 1/3, not 1/4.

Related Posts

ElasticMapReduce And RStudio

Tanzir Musabbir demonstrates how to set up Amazon ElasticMapReduce to include an RStudio edge node: RStudio Server provides a browser-based interface for R and a popular tool among data scientists. Data scientist use Apache Spark cluster running on  Amazon EMR to perform distributed training. In a previous blog post, the author showed how you can install RStudio Server on Amazon […]

Read More

Mutating Data Frames Without dplyr

John Mount points out that there is a built-in function to mutate data frames in R: The notation we used above is the “explicit argument” variation we recommend for readability. What a lot of dplyr users do not seem to know is: base-R already has this functionality. The function is called transform(). To demonstrate this, let’s first detach dplyr to show that […]

Read More

Categories

February 2018
MTWTFSS
« Jan Mar »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728