Restoration With Replacement

Joey D’Antoni tests whether RESTORE WITH REPLACE is functionally different from dropping a database and performing a restoration:

I recently read something that said using the RESTORE WITH REPLACE command could be faster than dropping a database and then performing a RESTORE, because the shell of the file could be used and therefore skip file initialization. I did not think that was the case, but books online wasn’t clear about the situation, so I went ahead and built a quick test case, using ProcMon from sysinternals. If you aren’t familar with the sysinternals tools, you should be—they are a good way to get under the hood of your Windows Server to see what’s going on, and if you’re old like me, you probably used PSEXEC to “telnet” into a Windows server to restart a service before RDP was a thing.

Read on to see how the processes compare.

Related Posts

When The Maximum Workspace Memory Isn’t The Internal Pool Maximum

Lonny Niederstadt answers the call from someone who needs the combination of Perfmon and DMV data: When is a maximum not really the maximum? When it’s a maximum for an explicitly or implicitly modified default. Whether “the definitive documentation” says so or not. Yesterday on Twitter #sqlhelp this question came up. ***** #sqlhelp Anyone have DEFINITIVE documentation on […]

Read More

Tracking Long-Running Queries

Ryan Booz walks us through tracking long-running queries with sp_whoisactive: This solution runs sp_WhoIsActive every minute and saves the output into a global temp table. From there, I look for any processes that have been running for more than the low threshold setting. Any of the processes that have not been identified and stored previously get logged, output […]

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

October 2017
MTWTFSS
« Sep  
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031