Restoration With Replacement

Joey D’Antoni tests whether RESTORE WITH REPLACE is functionally different from dropping a database and performing a restoration:

I recently read something that said using the RESTORE WITH REPLACE command could be faster than dropping a database and then performing a RESTORE, because the shell of the file could be used and therefore skip file initialization. I did not think that was the case, but books online wasn’t clear about the situation, so I went ahead and built a quick test case, using ProcMon from sysinternals. If you aren’t familar with the sysinternals tools, you should be—they are a good way to get under the hood of your Windows Server to see what’s going on, and if you’re old like me, you probably used PSEXEC to “telnet” into a Windows server to restart a service before RDP was a thing.

Read on to see how the processes compare.

Related Posts

Sizing Azure SQL Database

Arun Sirpal takes us through finding the right size for Azure SQL Database: Do you want to identify the correct Service Tier and Compute Size ( was once known as performance level) for your Azure SQL Database? How would you go about it? Would you use the DTU (Database Transaction Unit) calculator? What about the […]

Read More

Cleaning Up After Yourself in Azure Data Factory

Rayis Imayev shows how you can automatically delete old files in Azure Data Factory: File management may not be at the top of my list of priorities during data integration projects. I assume that once I learn enough about sourcing data systems and target destination platform, I’m ready to design and build a data integration […]

Read More

Categories

October 2017
MTWTFSS
« Sep Nov »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031