Join Elimination

Lukas Eder has a nice post explaining different forms of automatic join elimination:

We intended to fetch all customers and their addresses. But observe: We project only columns from the CUSTOMER table and we don’t have any predicates at all, specifically not predicates using the ADDRESS table. So, we’re completely ignoring any contributions from the ADDRESS table. We never really needed the JOIN in the first place!

And in fact, the optimiser can prove this too, because of the FOREIGN KEY constraint on C.ADDRESS_ID, which guarantees that every CUSTOMER record has exactly one corresponding ADDRESS record. The JOIN does not duplicate, nor remove any CUSTOMER rows, so it is unneeded and thus eliminated (by some, not all databases, will list each database at the end of the article).

So, the database can rewrite the SQL statement to the following, equivalent SQL statement in the presence of said FOREIGN KEY

Read on for a comparison across different products as well.

Related Posts

Hiding Work: The Nested Loop Operator

Erik Darling explains that the nested loop operator is like a duck: there’s more going on beneath the surface than it lets on: I’m going to talk about my favorite example, because it can cause a lot of confusion, and can hide a lot of the work it’s doing behind what appears to be a […]

Read More

Stored Procedure IF Branching and Performance

Erik Darling explains that the IF block in a stored procedure won’t help you with performance: Making plan choices with IF branches like this plain doesn’t work.The optimizer compiles a plan for both branches based on the initial compile value.What you end up with is a stored proc that doesn’t do what it’s supposed to […]

Read More

Categories

September 2017
MTWTFSS
« Aug Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930