Cardinality Estimator Regressions

SQL Scotsman has a great post on figuring out which of your queries have become worse as a result of the SQL Server cardinality estimator changes in 2014:

Instantly it is apparent that the most resource intensive query was the same query across both workload tests and note that the query hash is consistent too.  It is also apparent that this query performs worse under the new cardinality estimator model version 120.  To investigate and understand why this particular query behaves differently under the different cardinality estimators we’ll need to look at the actual query and the execution plans.

Looking at the information in #TempCEStats and the execution plans, the problematic query below belongs to the SLEV stored procedure.

There’s also a discussion of Query Store in there, but it’s important to understand how to figure this out even if you’re on 2014 and don’t have access to Query Store.

Related Posts

Monitoring Query Store Space usage

Erin Stellato has a process which alerts her when query store space utilization reaches a defined threshold: For those of you not familiar with the Query Store settings, please check out my post which lists each one, the defaults, and what I would recommend for values and why.  When discussing MAX_STORAGE_SIZE_MB, I mention monitoring via sys.database_query_store_options or […]

Read More

Nested Loops, Hash, Or Merge: Which Is Best?

Grant Fritchey dodges the important questions: First response, also a joke, was the question at the title of this post: What is the preferred operator when joining tables: Hash Match, Nested Loops or Merge? While my immediate response to this question is, yes. Meaning, they’re all preferred, situationally. I decided to expand on that a […]

Read More

Categories

November 2016
MTWTFSS
« Oct Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930