Using SET NOCOUNT ON

Kevin Feasel

2016-11-28

T-SQL

Andy Levy discusses the SET NOCOUNT operation:

So what happened here?  When you execute a query against SQL Server, both your data and some additional information is sent back to the client. This additional information is sent via a separate channel which is accessible via the SqlConnection.InfoMessages (or if you’re still using classic ADO, the InfoMessage) event. When you run queries in SSMS, you see this information in the Messages tab of the results pane most often as X row(s) affected.

That’s where my new stored procedures were causing problems. Where the original procedures were returning only one event which corresponded to the number of records returned by the single query in each procedure. But now that I’m loading temp tables, I’m getting multiple messages back – at a minimum, a count of the records affected when loading the temp table plus a count of the records returned to the calling application.

Data layers which can’t handle information streams are rare, but they do show up in the wild sometimes.

Related Posts

Computing Time to Payment on Invoices

Daniel Hutmacher has a painful but realistic problem to solve: Here’s an example customer. You’ll notice right off the bat that we’re sending this customer an invoice every day on the 20th of the month. To add some complexity, the customer will arbitrarily pay parts of the invoiced amount over time, and to add insult […]

Read More

Tracking Who Changed Data

Bert Wagner is on a quest to find out who moved his cheese: Have you ever wondered who was the last person (or process) to modify a piece of data in your database? SQL Server offers plenty of system views and functions that provide insight into how your server is running and how your queries are performing. […]

Read More

Categories

November 2016
MTWTFSS
« Oct Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930