Using SET NOCOUNT ON

Kevin Feasel

2016-11-28

T-SQL

Andy Levy discusses the SET NOCOUNT operation:

So what happened here?  When you execute a query against SQL Server, both your data and some additional information is sent back to the client. This additional information is sent via a separate channel which is accessible via the SqlConnection.InfoMessages (or if you’re still using classic ADO, the InfoMessage) event. When you run queries in SSMS, you see this information in the Messages tab of the results pane most often as X row(s) affected.

That’s where my new stored procedures were causing problems. Where the original procedures were returning only one event which corresponded to the number of records returned by the single query in each procedure. But now that I’m loading temp tables, I’m getting multiple messages back – at a minimum, a count of the records affected when loading the temp table plus a count of the records returned to the calling application.

Data layers which can’t handle information streams are rare, but they do show up in the wild sometimes.

Related Posts

Bugs and Pitfalls with Non-Determinism

Itzik Ben-Gan has started a new series on T-SQL bugs, pitfalls, and best practices. The first post in this series is on non-deterministic behavior: A nondeterministic function is a function that given the same inputs, can return different results in different executions of the function. Classic examples are SYSDATETIME, NEWID, and RAND (when invoked without […]

Read More

Changing Constraints in Near-Zero Downtime Situations

I have part six of my interminable series on near-zero downtime deployments: The locking story is not the same as with the primary and unique key constraints. First, there’s one extra piece: the transition will block access to dbo.LookupTable as well as the table we create the constraint on. That’s to keep us from deleting rows in […]

Read More

Categories

November 2016
MTWTFSS
« Oct Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930