sp_executesql Performance

Grant Fritchey takes a look at the performance of sp_executesql:

The results are fun.

Execution TypeAverage Duration
sp_executesqlAVG: 57946.03187251
Ad HocAVG: 14788.8924302789

What’s going on? Is the conclusion that, in fact, ad hoc queries are faster than sp_executesql?

Absolutely not.

I cheated.

Using sp_executesql is about protecting yourself when executing dynamic SQL, not about performance gains.

Related Posts

Pivoting Performance Counter Data

Dave Bland shows how you can build a dynamic pivot to see performance counter data over a stretch of time: The next step is to write the code to capture the counter values and insert the data it the temporary table created above.  Because we need to capture the values over a period of time, […]

Read More

Near-Zero Downtime Identity Column Changes

I’m getting close to the end of my series on near-zero downtime deployments. This latest post involves identity column changes: There are some tables where you create an identity value and expect to cycle through data. An example for this might be a queue table, where the data isn’t expected to live permanently but it […]

Read More

Categories

November 2016
MTWTFSS
« Oct Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930