Hadoop And SQL Server Are Complements

Kevin Feasel

2016-05-05

Hadoop

Jim Scott explains that Hadoop and relational databases solve different problems:

That’s the basics. Peeling back the onion more reveals other distinct differences, further making the case more strongly for a Hadoop-RDBMS coexistence strategy. RDBMS has the backing of the biggest names in the software industry, and as such has fostered an install base of IT talent probably second to none. RDBMS integrate very well with other systems, and represent a very mature technology having venerable, 40-year old roots. RDBMS are baked into the very fabric of just about every mid-to large sized IT organization in the world. Believe it – RDBMS aren’t going away any time soon, nor should they.

Relational databases have a strong mathematical footing which provides unparalleled data integrity.  Hadoop has a strong mathematical footing which provides near-linear scale out.  The key is knowing the problem you need to solve and how to integrate the results.

Related Posts

Calculating YARN Utilization Metrics

Dmitry Tolpeko shows how you can calculate per-second cluster utilization measures from YARN’s resource manager logs: But even if you query YARN REST API every second it still can only provide a snapshot of the used YARN resources. It does not show which application allocates or releases containers, their memory and CPU capacity, in which […]

Read More

Spark Streaming DStreams

Manish Mishra explains the fundamental abstraction of Spark Streaming: Before going into details of the operations available on the DStream API, let us look at the input sources from which we can start a Stream. There are multiple ways in which we can get the inputs from e.g. Kafka, Flume, etc. Or simple Idle files. […]

Read More

Categories

May 2016
MTWTFSS
« Apr Jun »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031