Against DBCC Commands

Erik Darling doesn’t like (most) DBCC commands:

Not what they do, just that the syntax isn’t consistent (do I need quotes around this string or not?), the results are a distraction to get into a usable table, and you need to write absurd loops to perform object-at-a-time data gathering. I’m not talking about running DBCC CHECKDB (necessarily), or turning on Trace Flags, or any cache-clearing commands — you know, things that perform actions — I mean things that spit tabular results at you.

I completely agree.  One of the nicest things about SQL is that I can use the same syntax to read metadata that I can data.  DBCC commands are a jarring difference.

Related Posts

Notifications when Admins Connect to a SQL Server

Jon Shaulis builds a logon trigger to notify when sysadmins log into his systems: I was helping someone set up some monitoring in their database and they were asking about being notified when someone with administrative privileges logs into SQL Server. While many of you know that I try to use the right tool for […]

Read More

Memory Defaults in SQL Server 2019

Randolph West looks at a new settings tab in the SQL Server 2019 installation: In 2016 I created the Max Server Memory Matrix as a guide for configuring the maximum amount of memory that should be assigned to SQL Server, using an algorithm developed by Jonathan Kehayias. SQL Server 2019 is still in preview as I write this, but […]

Read More

Categories

April 2016
MTWTFSS
« Mar May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930