Using The YEAR Function

Kendra Little looks at the performance ramifications of using the YEAR() function:

But if we hover over that index seek, we can see in the tooltip that there’s a hidden predicate that is NOT a seek predicate. This is a hidden filter. And because this is SQL Server 2016, we can see “Number of Rows Read” — it had to read 9.3 million rows to count 1.9 million rows. It didn’t realize the 2006 rows were together– it checked all the females and examined the FakeBirthDateStamp column for each row.

Built-in functions can cause SARGability issues.

Related Posts

Adaptive Joins and Index Width

Erik Darling wants to pump your indexes up: Now, there’s an Extended Event that… Used to work. These days it just stares blankly at me. But since I’ve worked with this before, I know the problem. It’s that Key Lookup — I’ll explain more in a minute. Adaptive joins won’t do all the work for you, […]

Read More

Making Non-SARGable Queries SARGable with an Index

Denis Gobo violates Betteridge’s Law of Headlines: This question came up the other day from a co-worker, he said he couldn’t change a query but was there a way of making the same query produce a better plan by doing something else perhaps (magic?) He said his query had a WHERE clause that looked like […]

Read More

Categories

March 2016
MTWTFSS
« Feb Apr »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031