CTEs And Semi-Colons

Jason Brimhall discusses common table expressions:

Wait! Hold on two seconds there! Surely the semi-colon is an absolute requirement because we see it everywhere that it is a mandatory requirement.

The reality is that the semi-colon requirement is not really entirely accurate. If the CTE happens to be in the same batch, then the previous statement in the batch must be terminated by the semi-colon.

This post went down an unexpected path, and ended up being rather interesting.  Read the whole thing.

Comparing Nullable Columns

Daniel Hutmacher shows an elegant way to compare multiple nullable columns on two tables:

Because we’ve added OR conditions into the mix, we’re forced to use the Nested Loop join, which loops over table B for every single row in A. That’s a lot of index scans and it comes with a hefty price tag.

Here’s an absolutely eye-watering beautiful pattern that I found on the Interwebs (though I forgot where) the other day.

This is an interesting use of INTERSECT.  Check it out.

Quantified Comparsion Predicates

Kevin Feasel

2016-07-13

Syntax

Lukas Eder discusses the ALL, SOME, and ANY predicates:

Ultimately, you should always choose performance first, and then – most certainly – intuitiveness second (because some poor soul might need to maintain your query). But personally, I find these quantifiers quite elegant for three reasons:

  1. They express the quantification right where it belongs. With the comparison operator. Compare this with the solution using LIMIT, which may be far away, visually, from the greater-than operator. Quantifiers are much more concise, even than when using MAX() (in my opinion)

  2. They’re very set oriented. I like thinking in terms of sets when I work with SQL. Whenever I can omit the ORDER BY clause, I will. If only to avoid potentially slow operations (in case the database doesn’t optimise this, and a full O(N log N) sort operation is invoked)

  3. Quantified comparison predicates work on rows too, not just on single values.

I’ve known about these, but could probably count on one hand the number of times I’ve ever used one.

Unpivoting With APPLY

I have a post on using the APPLY operator to unpivot data:

This code works, but if you have dozens of years, it gets messy writing those case statements and you’re a bit more likely to make a mistake when refactoring code. Here’s a simpler version using CROSS APPLY:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SELECT
    s.Product,
    y.[Year],
    y.Quantity,
    y.[Value]
FROM #Sales s
    CROSS APPLY (VALUES
        (2013, [Qty2013], [Val2013]),
        (2014, [Qty2014], [Val2014]),
        (2015, [Qty2015], [Val2015])
    ) y([Year], Quantity, [Value]);

It’s a little easier to read than the other version, and adding additional years is pretty straightforward.  That makes for a great tip when you’re trying to refactor poorly-thought-out tables or bring into your system potentially well-thought-out flat files.

APPLY is an elegant solution to so many different classes of problem.

Basic XML Querying

Kevin Feasel

2016-07-01

Syntax

Steve Jones discusses a couple peculiarities of XML querying within SQL Server:

This doesn’t work.

The reason this doesn’t work is that XML is case sensitive. Meaning ORDERID != OrderID. The former is in the query, the latter in the XML document. If I change the query, this works (note I have OrderID below).

Like Steve, I’m not a big fan of doing XML processing within SQL Server, but if it’s a necessary part of your workload, it’s worth knowing.

Watch Those Parentheses

Kenneth Fisher shows how to see open and close parenthetical locations:

You’ll notice that when I go over the parentheses the one I’ve selected and it’s pair turn yellow, unless there isn’t a pair of course. You can also use Ctrl-] to flip between the open and close parenthesis in a pair. This can be particularly useful to make sure that you remembered a close parenthesis at the end of a subquery. In this case that last close parenthesis doesn’t have a match. Now finding out that you are missing an open parenthesis doesn’t mean you know where it’s supposed to go. But you can track the different pairs, making sure that each time you open a parenthesis you close it in the correct place. In this case it belonged right at the beginning.

FYI yellow isn’t the default (it’s a light gray). I find the default hard to see (I’m getting old) so I changed it to yellow in the options under fonts and colors.

Read the whole thing.

LEN Is For Strings

Kenneth Fisher notes that the LEN function can behave oddly on non-string data types:

Which show you that the FLOAT had to be converted to VARCHAR. You can see the same thing if you try it with various versions of INT or DATE datatypes as well. Like I said earlier. No big deal with INT or even DATE. Those come back in a fairly expected format. (INTs look exactly the same and DATEs come back as ‘YYYY-MM-DD’). FLOAT and REAL however are floating point so they don’t always convert the same way. If you do the conversion deliberately you get this:

Understand your data types; otherwise, it might come back to hurt you later.

Recursive CTEs

Kevin Feasel

2016-05-27

Syntax

Steve Jones gives a simple recursive CTE example and an important lesson on compounding:

Recursion is an interesting computer science technique that stumps lots of people. When I was learning programming, it seemed that recursion (in Pascal) and pointers (in C), were the weed out topics.

However, they aren’t that bad, and with CTEs, we can write recursion in T-SQL. I won’t cover where this might be used in this post, though I will give you a simple CTE to view.

There are two parts you need: the anchor and the recursive member. These are connected with a UNION ALL. There can be multiple items, but we’ll keep things simple.

You can play query golf and find a way to remove the recursion, but it’s good to know how to create a recursive CTE.  It’s also good to know that you typically do not want recursion in a database process…

Plus Equals Operator

Andy Mallon shows off the += operator in T-SQL:

This is logically equivalent to the first version of the code, but I find it makes for more readable code. It just looks cleaner.

For those of us who are lazy looking to maximize efficiency, this could save a whole lot of key strokes.

This is true, but if you’re on SQL Server 2012 or later, check out CONCAT for concatenation, as it handles NULL values more elegantly.

SET STATISTICS XML

Kevin Feasel

2016-05-23

Syntax

Daniel Hutmacher explains how SET STATISTICS XML will generate execution plans for certain segments of code:

But sometimes you want to run a series of statements or procedures where you only want the execution plan for some of the statements. Here’s how:

The actual execution plan is enabled by turning on SET STATISTICS XML., not unlike enabling STATISTICS IO or TIME. And just like SET NOCOUNT, the SET statements apply to the current context, which could be a stored procedure, a session, etc. When this context ends, the setting reverts to that of the parent context.

I see code snippets with STATISTICS IO and TIME fairly regularly, but almost never see STATISTICS XML; instead, I see people (including myself) hit Ctrl-M or select the “Include Actual Execution Plan” button when generating execution plans is desirable.

Categories

June 2017
MTWTFSS
« May  
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930