Press "Enter" to skip to content

Category: T-SQL Tuesday

Preventing Legacy Code

Deborah Melkin shares some tips on preventing code from becoming “legacy code”:

This is an interesting question. In some ways, it’s hard to say how my code has aged. no one is yelling at me that my code is breaking production, so that’s a good sign. I have definitely talked about times where I wish I could go back and do something differently because it would have been a little bit smarter to do. I’m no longer at some of those companies and one of them doesn’t even exist in that incarnation anymore so I have no clue how that code is being used or if it even got fully implemented. I’ve done a lot of reviews of other people’s code and the most problematic legacy code was the code that would have been problematic at the time it was written but was good enough to get by.

Read on for a couple of broad tips that can help keep your code from becoming “legacy code” in the pejorative sense of the term.

Comments closed

Being a Steward of Code

Louis Davidson shares a perspective:

So not only do I know how some of my code has aged, I am constantly reminded of it. I think of it in different ways:

  • How well the code was written in the first place
  • If it is still in use
  • If it can be/has been modified by someone else (or even you)

Some of this can be a challenge given external constraints, like needing to get it in production now-now-now! But I do like the way Louis thinks about the problem.

Comments closed

T-SQL Tuesday 194 Round-Up

Louis Davidson has made a big mistake:

As I sit here, preparing to write my roundup post, I have not read anyone else’s post yet. I thought it would be good to introduce the idea first, recap to the other posts, then mine. I won’t share any detail of the mistake I shared, but I do want to mention something I included in my post. Types of mistakes. Mistakes of choice, and mistakes of accidents.

Read on for a nice round-up of a popular topic.

Comments closed

Lessons Learned from a Trigger

Pat Wright tells a story:

I haven’t participated in a #TSQL Tuesday in quite some time.  I saw this topic and said, “That’s perfect!”  I love talking about Failure and mistakes!  I have a whole presentation about it, and I’m hoping to make a series of blog posts about it very soon.   

You do not learn from success in life; you learn from failure.  I hope you are making lots of mistakes so that you can learn! 

Read on for a story from Pat around creating a trigger and not realizing the consequences. This is why we don’t let just anybody have mogwais triggers.

Comments closed

Optimized Locking and Change Event Streaming in SQL Server 2025

Deb Melkin is looking forward to a pair of features:

When I look at this release, I feel like I’ve been more tuned into what’s coming out than any other. I’m still not sure how that happened. But I think overall it’s a good thing because there really is a lot being packed into this release. If you’re just trying to figure out now, you’re already behind.

There are really 2 features that I’m really excited about:

Read on to learn more about both of them.

Comments closed

Changes to Backups in SQL Server 2025

Steve Jones notes one interesting change to backups in SQL Server 2025:

I’ve been a DBA (or Ops manager) for quite a bit of my career, and one of the things I’ve thought was top priority was backups. I always want to be sure I have a recovery strategy, because if I don’t, nothing matters. Things go wrong and systems fail and I need to protect systems.

Security is a close second, but backups really matter.

Something else backup-related that Steve doesn’t mention is the new form of backup compression using ZSTD. Initial testing of this has been fairly positive and I think it’s worth trying it out as well.

Comments closed

SQL Server Standard Developer Edition

Chad Callihan is excited about a limitation:

I had written most of this blog post before seeing this month’s T-SQL Tuesday invite. I decided to hold off a few days to post because, while it’s no secret, I think it’s worth pointing out to those that may not know: before you spend time testing SQL Server 2025, make sure you consider what version of Developer Edition to use.

You may read that and ask, “What do you mean? Isn’t there only one Developer Edition?” That used to be the case, but not anymore.

Read on to see why this is important for a large number of companies.

Comments closed

Fuzzy Text Match in SQL Server

Rob Farley is excited:

However, SQL Server 2025 does bring some great options for doing fuzzy string matches, making custom Data Quality options even richer. I’ve spoken about this at some user groups recently (including tomorrow, remotely for TriPASS, and in a few weeks in Melbourne and Sydney for Difinity), and in that session I go much deeper into how I see data matching going. I’ll also write more about these methods in future posts, but it’ll take a few posts, covering quite a few sub-topics.

If you want to see that session, our user group (the Triangle Area SQL Server Users Group) is hosting it Wednesday morning Australia time, or this evening US Eastern Standard Time.

Comments closed