Press "Enter" to skip to content

Category: Security

Don’t Run Services As Root On Linux

Kellyn Pot’vin-Gorman explains why running SQL Server as root is a bad idea:

Although enhancements have changed Windows installations for applications to run with a unique user, I created a mssql OS user even back on SQL Server 2000 on Windows as I had a tendency to use similar security practices for all database platforms as a multi-platform DBA.  With that being said-  yes, it introduced complexity, but it was for a reason: users should be restricted to the least amount of privileges required.  To grant any application or database “God” powers on a host is akin to granting DBA to every user in the database, but at the host level.  As important as security is to DBAs INSIDE the database, it should be just as important to us OUTSIDE of it on the host it resides on.

Security is important and has become more complex with the increase of security breaches and introduction of the cloud.  One of the most simple ways to do this is to ensure that all application owners on a host are granted only the privileges they require.  The application user should only utilize SUDO, stick bit, iptables, SUID, SGID and proper group creation/allocation if and when required.

It’s the same reason we don’t recommend giving everyone sa rights to databases.  Read on for more.

Comments closed

Aggregations And Always Encrypted

Monica Rathbun finds trouble with Always Encrypted:

The real challenges started when the client began to test their application code. The first thing we hit was triggers.

The table had several insert triggers associated with the columns that were now encrypted. Since the data was now encrypted the insert triggers would fail. Again, we lucked out and they were able to recode somethings in order to remove the triggers. Of course, since troubles always come in threes, this was no different. First the constraint problem, then the triggers, then we hit the biggest road block that halted our Always Encrypted implementation.

Read on for more information about the things you cannot do with Always Encrypted, including some limitations which will eventually go away.

Comments closed

Storing Credentials For Containers

Andrew Pruski shows how to store a credential using Powershell and pass it into a Docker container:

I work with SQL Server in containers pretty much exclusively when testing code and one of my real bug bears is that SQL Server in containers does not support Windows authentication (unless you’re using Windocks).

So when I’m working I find it quite annoying to have to specify a SA username & password when I want to connect.

OK, I can use Get-Credential, assign to a variable, and then reference that in a connection string but I want something a bit more permanent especially as I always use the same password for all my containers

Read on for Andrew’s method, and check out Rob Sewell’s method in the comments.

Comments closed

Flexible Active Directory Account Lookup In Powershell

Jana Sattainathan builds a flexible AD lookup cmdlet in Powershell:

Now, the problem is that I have to lookup the AD User account for each of these users to add to the AD group “CrisisManagement_ReadOnly_Group”. Although I still use the AD module command Get-ADUser to lookup names, I have to do so one name at a time like this:

Get-ADUser -Filter ‘(name -like “*David*”) -and (name -like “*Smith*”)’

The above method is tedious and time consuming, especially if it is a long list of users. I would rather paste the list that the sender sent me as is into a PowerShell command and auto-magically add the corresponding accounts to the AD group. If we are unable to find an user, report it as an error.

Click through for the code and more.

Comments closed

Service Broker Security

Misha Capewell has a quick synopsis of the two flavors of service broker security:

There are 2 types of security in Service Broker: dialog and transport. Dialog security establishes a secure, authenticated connection between Service Broker Services or dialog endpoints. Transport security establishes an authenticated network connection between SQL Server instances or Service Broker endpoints. Clear as mud, right? Don’t worry, these are easily mixed up by both novice and experienced Service Broker admins. To illustrate, let’s go back to our taxes scenario. You’ve completed your forms, stamped your envelope and you’re ready to mail it in. You drop it in your nearest mailbox and what happens next? A postal worker will pick it up, it gets loaded into a truck and shipped between various sorting facilities (as you might have noticed I have no clue how the USPS works) until it is finally delivered to the IRS via yet another postal worker. Now, those postal workers all have the authority to transport your tax return from point to point. However, they do not have the authority to open up and read your return. That’s what transport security is. The IRS agent on the other end, though, he does have the authority to read your return. That’s dialog security.

Click through for more details, including a couple of scripts to help configure each form of security.

Comments closed

Active Directory And ElasticMapReduce

Bruno Faria shows how to use AWS’s CloudFormation to extend Active Directory into an AWS ElasticMapReduce cluster and run jobs via Kerberos:

In this example, you build a solution that allows Active Directory users to seamlessly access Amazon EMR clusters and run big data jobs. Here’s what you need before setting up this solution:

  • An AWS account
  • An Amazon EC2 key pair
  • A possible limit increase for your account (Note: Usually a limit increase will not be necessary. See the AWS Service Limits documentation if you encounter a limit error while building the solution.)

To make it easier for you to get started, I created AWS CloudFormation templates that automatically configure and deploy the solution for you. The following steps and resources are involved in setting up the solution:

  1. Create and configure an Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (Amazon VPC).
  2. Launch an Amazon EC2 Windows instance (Active Directory domain controller).
  3. Create an Amazon EMR security configuration for Kerberos and cross-realm trust.
  4. Launch an Amazon EMR cluster with Kerberos enabled and a cross-realm trust configuration.

You can use the AWS CloudFormation templates to complete each step individually, or you can deploy the entire solution through a single step.

Read the whole thing.

Comments closed

Failure To Connect With A SQL Login

Bert Wagner hits on the most common reason why you might fail to connect with a SQL authentication login:

I thought it would be best to start with a clean slate so I created a new SQL login and database user so that I could definitively figure out which permissions are needed.

Normally I use Windows Authentication for my logins, but this time I thought “since I’m getting crazy learning new things, let me try creating a SQL Login instead.”

After I created my login, I decided to test connecting to my server before digging into the permissions. Result?

After the fifth or sixth time it happens to you, you start making that the first thing you check.

Comments closed

Permissions And Dynamic SQL

Eric Blinn shows that dynamic SQL in stored procedures changes the security paradigm a bit:

Security was controlled by granting EXECUTE permissions only to appropriate stored procedures and by explicitly not granting permission to any tables or views within the database.

One of the procedures was getting a bad query plan and timing out. This is when I was called in. The procedure was performing a search based on an unknown number of up to 10 search parameters. The code was filled with many AND/OR combinations to account for the users’ ability to include any combination of search parameters. I found this procedure to be a prime candidate for dynamic SQL where I would create the select statement including only the search parameters entered by the user into the WHERE clause.

Immediately upon testing the users started to receive SELECT permission denied errors. It turns out that when you change to dynamic SQL and call your statement through sp_ExecuteSQL that the permissions are lost. Our options were to grant explicit select permission on the objects or to refactor the code such that it does not use dynamic SQL anymore.

The best solution here would probably be to use a certificate to sign the procedure and give that certificate user rights to select from the tables used in dynamic SQL.

Comments closed

Fun With Meltdown And Spectre

Brent Ozar looks at some of the consequences of Meltdown and Spectre for SQL Server DBAs:

That’s because some test results have found big slowdowns when the operating system is patched for Meltdown and/or Spectre. These are big vulnerabilities in the processors themselves, and OS vendors are having to make big changes that aren’t tuned for performance yet. Early benchmarks yesterday were showing 30% drops in PostgreSQL performance, but thankfully newer benchmarks have been showing smaller drops. Red Hat’s benchmarks show 3-7% slower analytics workloads, and 8-12% slower OLTP.

Joey D’Antoni has more:

Will This Impact My Performance?

Probably–especially If you are running on virtual hardware. For workloads on bare metal, the security risk is much lower, so Microsoft is offering a registry option to not include the microcode fixes. Longer term especially if you are audited, or allow application code to run on your database servers, you will need to enable the microcode options.

This will likely get better over time as software patches are released, that are better optimized to make fewer calls. Ultimately, this will need to fixed on the hardware side, and we will need a new generation of hardware to completely solve the security issue with a minimum impact.

Allan Hirt has even more:

There are two bugs which are known as Meltdown and Spectre. The Register has a great summarized writeup here – no need for me to regurgitate. This is a hardware issue – nothing short of new chips will eradicate it. That said, pretty much everyone who has written an OS, hypervisor, or software has (or will have) patches to hopefully eliminate this flaw. This blog post covers physical, virtualized, and cloud-based deployments of Windows, Linux, and SQL Server.

The fact every vendor is dealing with this swiftly is a good thing. The problem? Performance will most likely be impacted. No one knows the extent, especially with SQL Server workloads. You’re going to have to test and reset any expectations/performance SLAs. You’ll need new baselines and benchmarks. There is some irony here that it seems virtualized workloads will most likely take the biggest hit versus ones on physical deployments. Time will tell – no one knows yet.

This will have long-term ramifications.  We’ll deal with them like we’ve dealt with other issues in the past, but it does seem that, at least for now, there will be some performance hit from this.

Comments closed

Avoid Impersonation And The Trustworthy Flag

Solomon Rutzky explains how you can use module signing to avoid the security risks which come with impersonation and setting Trustworthy on:

Admittedly, using Cross-Database Ownership Chaining and/or Impersonation and/or TRUSTWORTHY are quicker and easier to implement than Module Signing. However, the relative simplicity in understanding and implementing these options comes at a cost: the security of your system.

  • Cross-DB Ownership Chaining:
    • security risk (can spoof User / DB-level)
    • db_ddladmin & db_owner users can create objects for other owners
    • Users with CREATE DATABASE permission can create new databases and attach existing databases
  • Impersonation:
    • If IMPERSONATE permission is required:
      • can be used any time
      • No granular control over permissions
    • Cross-DB operations need TRUSTWORTHY ON
    • Need to use ORIGINAL_LOGIN() for Auditing
    • Elevated permissions last until process / sub-process ends or REVERT
  • TRUSTWORTHY:
    • Bigger security risk
      • can also spoof Logins, such as “sa” !
      • If using SQLCLR Assemblies, no per-Assembly control of ability to be marked as either EXTERNAL_ACCESS or UNSAFEall Assemblies are eligible to be marked as either of those elevated permission sets.

The common theme across all three areas is no control, within a Database, over who or what can make use of the feature / option, or when it can be used.

Read the whole thing.

Comments closed