The previous histogram shows the total return from randomly generated signals in 10^{4} simulations. The vertical line is the result from using
prophet
. As you can see, it is a bit higher than the average of the distribution. The total return fromprophet
is lower than the return of the naive strategy in 27.5 percent of the simulations. This is not a bad result. But, notice that we didn’t add trading or liquidity costs to the analysis, which will make the total returns worse.The main results of this simple study are clear:
prophet
is bad at point forecasts for returns but does quite better in directional predictions. It might be interesting to test it further, with more data, adding trading costs, other forecasting setups, and see if the results hold.
This is a very interesting article, worth reading. H/T R Bloggers