Louis Davidson continues a series:
As started in part 1 of this series, I have set out to test an LLMs ability to technical edit. For my first set of tests, I am using a pair of articles I created, filled with very bad advice. The advice is the same for both articles, but what differs is the intro and the conclusion. One says the advice is good, the other said it is bad. It is all very very bad, including a really terrible
SELECTstatement versus loop construct that will cause an eternal loop that inserts into a temporary table.My goal is to see how much of that advice will be noted as bad, and if it says anything nice at all about the text, etc. If you want to see the entire documents, you can get them here in a zip file, both in text and word document formats.
Starting with an extreme example like this is fine, I believe. Given the results, they were fine, though it sounds like Louis won’t be out of a job anytime soon.