Press "Enter" to skip to content

Day: March 27, 2026

Tips for Performance Tuning SQL Server

Published 2026-03-27 by Kevin Feasel

Paul Randal provides a framework:

There are a huge number of best practices around SQL Server performance tuning – I could easily write a whole book on the topic, especially when you consider the number of different database settings, server settings, coding practices, wait types, and so on that can affect performance. For this post I decided to step back a bit from a list of specifics and list some general recommendations for how to approach performance tuning so that you maximize effort and minimize distractions.

Click through for several recommendations to make your performance tuning operations a bit smoother. None of these relate to specific performance problems. Rather, the post serves as some recommendations around how to approach performance tuning in general.

Leave a Comment

Building the Well-Architected Framework for Fabric

Published 2026-03-27 by Kevin Feasel

Joey D’Antoni applies Azure principles to Microsoft Fabric:

Let’s take a step back and talk about why I built this session. Like it or not, Microsoft’s intention with Fabric (and Power BI before it) is to make it easier for less-technical business users to build and consume data-driven reports. While I understand this mission, and it has been wildly successful in spreading love for Power BI, despite Fabric’s software-as-a-service branding, it’s actually a fully fledged data engine that needs to be well-managed to ensure data governance, security, and adherence to general best practices. In building my demos, I created a sample workspace with a couple of objects.

Click through for more notes on Joey’s talk, as well as a link to the code.

Leave a Comment

Performance Testing DATE_BUCKET()

Published 2026-03-27 by Kevin Feasel

Louis Davidson runs some tests:

A month and a half ago, I wrote a blog on using DATE_BUCKET. It is a cool feature thta makes doing some grouping really quite easy. It is here: Cool features in SQL Server I missed…DATE_BUCKET. One of the comments that came in was about performance of the DATE_BUCKET versus using things like DATEDIFF or a date table.

I started working on it then, but it got a bit involved (as performance comparison tests often do), so it took me a bit longer to get to than expected. But here it is, and the results are kind of what you would expect. The uses for DATE_BUCKET are really straightforward, and would rarely involve an index or a lot of filtering using the the function. But over a large number of rows, if it takes more time (even a millisecond more) than another method, you would notice it pretty quickly adding up.

Read on to see how DATE_BUCKET() performs compared to other methods of solving the same problem.

Leave a Comment

Batch versus Stream for Data Processing

Published 2026-03-27 by Kevin Feasel

Nikola Ilic answers a question and then the follow-up question:

If you’ve spent any time in the data engineering world, you’ve likely encountered this debate at least once. Maybe twice. Ok, probably a dozen times “Should we process our data in batches or in real-time?” And if you’re anything like me, you’ve noticed that the answer usually starts with: “Well, it depends…”

Which is true. It does depend. But “it depends” is only useful if you actually know what it depends on. And that’s the gap I want to fill with this article. Not another theoretical comparison of batch vs. stream processing (I hope you already know the basics). Instead, I want to give you a practical framework for deciding which approach makes sense for your specific scenario, and then show you how both paths look when implemented in Microsoft Fabric.

Read on to learn why both are viable patterns and how you can work with both in Microsoft Fabric.

Leave a Comment

SQL Server Performance Monitor Videos

Published 2026-03-27 by Kevin Feasel

Erik Darling continues a series of videos for his SQL Server Performance Monitor. First up is a breakdown of the two editions (both of which are free):

In this video, I delve into my new, completely free, open-source SQL Server monitoring tool, discussing which edition—full or light—you might find most useful based on your specific needs. The full edition creates a database and agent jobs to continuously collect data, offering complete control over the collection schedule and allowing for easy customization of stored procedures. It’s ideal for scenarios where you need constant data collection and want the flexibility to manage the monitoring tool as needed. On the other hand, the light edition uses an embedded DuckDB version inside itself, collecting data only when it’s open, making it perfect for quick triage or situations with limited server access, ensuring that no data is missed while you’re away from your computer. Both editions offer alerts and notifications for critical issues like blocking and high CPU usage, providing a seamless experience regardless of which edition you choose.

Erik also has a video covering how to communicate with the built-in MCP server:

In this video, I delve into the built-in MCP server feature of my FreeSQL server monitoring tool, Darling Data. This feature allows users to interact with their collected monitoring data in a conversational manner using language models like Claude or other compatible tools. The MCP server is designed for local use only and does not expose any data beyond what’s available within the performance monitor database, ensuring that no sensitive information is at risk. By enabling this feature, you can ask questions about your server’s performance directly to an LLM, receiving quick insights into issues such as deadlocks, query performance, and workload spikes. This approach simplifies the process of diagnosing problems without requiring extensive manual analysis or script writing.

Leave a Comment