MRAN Changes and a Survey

Kevin Feasel

2019-05-23

R

David Smith discusses potential changes to MRAN:

As CRAN has grown and changes to packages have become more frequent, maintaining MRAN is an increasingly resource-intensive process. We’re contemplating changes, like changing the frequency of snapshots, or thinning the archive of snapshots that haven’t been used. But before we do that we’d  like to hear from the community first. Have you used MRAN snapshots? If so, how are you using them? How many different snapshots have you used, and how often do you change that up? Please leave your feedback at the survey link below by June 14, and we’ll use the feedback we gather in our decision-making process. Responses are anonymous, and we’ll summarize the responses in a future blog post. Thanks in advance!

Please take the survey as well. If you’ve used SQL Server Machine Learning Services (or SQL Server R Services), you’ve used MRAN.

Related Posts

Using Cohen’s D for Experiments

Nina Zumel takes us through Cohen’s D, a useful tool for determining effect sizes in experiments: Cohen’s d is a measure of effect size for the difference of two means that takes the variance of the population into account. It’s defined asd = | μ1 – μ2 | / σpooledwhere σpooled is the pooled standard deviation over both cohorts. […]

Read More

Comparing Iterator Performance in R

Ulrik Stervbo has a performance comparison for for, apply, and map functions in R: It is usually said, that for– and while-loops should be avoided in R. I was curious about just how the different alternatives compare in terms of speed. The first loop is perhaps the worst I can think of – the return vector is […]

Read More

Categories

May 2019
MTWTFSS
« Apr Jun »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031