The Problem With Meta-Packages

Kevin Feasel

2018-08-09

R

John Mount has a critique of meta-packages:

Derek Jones recently discussed a possible future for the R ecosystem in “StatsModels: the first nail in R’s coffin”.

This got me thinking on the future of CRAN (which I consider vital to R, and vital in distributing our work) in the era of super-popular meta-packages. Meta-packages are convenient, but they have a profoundly negative impact on the packages they exclude.

I’m not really sold on Jones’s argument, but I do think Mount has a good point.

Related Posts

The Lesser-Known Apply Functions In R

Andrew Treadway covers a few of the lesser-known apply functions in R: rapply Let’s start with rapply. This function has a couple of different purposes. One is to recursively apply a function to a list. We’ll get to that in a moment. The other use of rapply is to a apply a function to only those elements in […]

Read More

Controlling Azure Services In R With AzureR

Hong Ooi announces a new set of packages called AzureR: As background, some of you may remember the AzureSMR package, which was written a few years back as an R interface to Azure. AzureSMR was very successful and gained a significant number of users, but it was never meant to be maintainable in the long term. As […]

Read More

Categories

August 2018
MTWTFSS
« Jul Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031