The Problem With Meta-Packages

Kevin Feasel



John Mount has a critique of meta-packages:

Derek Jones recently discussed a possible future for the R ecosystem in “StatsModels: the first nail in R’s coffin”.

This got me thinking on the future of CRAN (which I consider vital to R, and vital in distributing our work) in the era of super-popular meta-packages. Meta-packages are convenient, but they have a profoundly negative impact on the packages they exclude.

I’m not really sold on Jones’s argument, but I do think Mount has a good point.

Related Posts

Improving Plots With ggformula

Sebastian Sauer shows how you can use the ggformula package combined with ggplot2 to enhance your R visuals: Since some time, there’s a wrapper for ggplot2 available, bundled in the package ggformula. One nice thing is that in that it plays nicely with the popular R package mosaic. mosaic provides some useful functions for modeling along with a tamed and consistent […]

Read More

Installing R From Powershell

Tomaz Kastrun shows us how to install R and RStudio via Powershell: For the brevity of this post, I will only download couple of R packages from CRAN repository, but this list is indefinite.There are ways many ways to retrieve the CRAN packages for particular R version using powershell. I will just demonstrate this by […]

Read More


August 2018
« Jul Sep »