The Problem With Meta-Packages

Kevin Feasel



John Mount has a critique of meta-packages:

Derek Jones recently discussed a possible future for the R ecosystem in “StatsModels: the first nail in R’s coffin”.

This got me thinking on the future of CRAN (which I consider vital to R, and vital in distributing our work) in the era of super-popular meta-packages. Meta-packages are convenient, but they have a profoundly negative impact on the packages they exclude.

I’m not really sold on Jones’s argument, but I do think Mount has a good point.

Related Posts

Timing R Function Calls

Colin Gillespie shows off an R package for benchmarking: Of course, it’s more likely that you’ll want to compare more than two things. You can compare as many function calls as you want with mark(), as we’ll demonstrate in the following example. It’s probably more likely that you’ll want to compare these function calls against more […]

Read More

Exploratory Data Analysis with inspectdf

Laura Ellis continues a dive into Exploratory Data Analysis, this time using the inspectdf package: I like this package because it’s got a lot of functionality and it’s incredibly straightforward to use. In short, it allows you to understand and visualize column types, sizes, values, value imbalance & distributions as well as correlations. Better yet, […]

Read More


August 2018
« Jul Sep »