Joins When No Join Types Are Valid

Kevin Feasel

2018-08-08

Syntax

Hugo Kornelis has a brain-teaser for us:

The query below can be executed in any version of the AdventureWorks sample database. Don’t bother understanding the logic, there is none. It is merely constructed to show how SQL Server handles what appears to be an impossible situation.

If you look at the descriptions of the various join operators in the Execution Plan Reference, you will see that this query poses the optimizer for what appears to be an insolvable problem: none of the join operators can be used for this query!

But it’s possible, and Hugo explains exactly what happens, as well as places where the optimizer could be better at solving the impossible (or at least marginally difficult).

Related Posts

Refreshing Views After DDL Changes

Eduardo Pivaral shows how you can refresh the metadata for a view in SQL Server after one of its underlying tables or functions changes: So we proceed to execute an alter view over the first view: ALTER VIEW dbo.[vi_invoices_received_by]ASSELECT ConfirmedReceivedBy as [Received by], COUNT(InvoiceID) as [# of Invoices], CustomerIDFROM Sales.InvoicesGROUP BY ConfirmedReceivedBy, CustomerID;GO So we […]

Read More

Order of Execution on SELECT Expressions

Bert Wagner digs into an interesting topic: Success! But as I was celebrating my dynamic SQL victory, I realized I was making an assumption about SQL Server that I had never thought about before: The above query only works because SQL Server is executing the variables in the SELECT list sequentially. I’m incrementing @CurrentRow only after processing […]

Read More

Categories

August 2018
MTWTFSS
« Jul Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031