Converting Factors To Numbers In R

Kevin Feasel



Sebastian Sauer shows us a pitfall of brute-force conversion of factors to integers:

Oh no! That’s not what we wanted! R has messed the thing up (?). The reason is that R sees the first factor level internally as the number 1 . The second level as number two. What’s the first factor level in our case? Let’s see:

factor(tips$sex) %>% head()#> [1] Female Male Male Male Female Male #> Levels: Female Malefactor(tips$sex_r) %>% head()#> [1] 1 0 0 0 1 0#> Levels: 0 1

That’s confusing: “0” is the first level of sex_r – internally for R represented by “1”. The second level of sex_r is “1” – internally represented by “2”.

Fortunately, we get the easy answer at the end of the post.

Related Posts

Defining Tidy Data

John Mount shares thoughts about the concept of tidy data: A question is: is such a data set “tidy”? The paper itself claims the above definitions are “Codd’s 3rd normal form.” So, no the above table is not “tidy” under that paper’s definition. The the winner’s date of birth is a fact about the winner […]

Read More

Visualizing Earthquake Data

Giorgio Garziano continues a series on analyzing earthquake data: This is the third part of our post series about the exploratory analysis of a publicly available dataset reporting earthquakes and similar events within a specific 30 days time span. In this post, we are going to show static, interactive and animated earthquakes maps of different flavors by […]

Read More


June 2018
« May Jul »