Scientific Debt

David Robinson gives us the data science analog to technical debt:

In my new job as Chief Data Scientist at DataCamp, I’ve been thinking about the role of data science within a business, and discussing this with other professionals in the field. On a panel earlier this year, I realized that data scientists have a rough equivalent to this concept: “scientific debt.”

Scientific debt is when a team takes shortcuts in data analysis, experimental practices, and monitoring that could have long-term negative consequences. When you hear a statement like:

  • “We don’t have enough time to run a randomized test, let’s launch it”
  • “To a first approximation this effect is probably linear”
  • “This could be a confounding factor, but we’ll look into that later”
  • “It’s directionally accurate at least”

you’re hearing a little scientific debt being “borrowed”.

Read the whole thing.  I strongly agree with the premise.

Related Posts

There Is No Easy Button With Predictive Analytics

Scott Mutchler dispels some myths: There are a couple of myths that I see more an more these days.  Like many myths they seem plausible on the surface but experienced data scientist know that the reality is more nuanced (and sadly requires more work). Myths: Deep learning (or Cognitive Analytics) is an easy button.  You […]

Read More

Downsides Of Logistic Regression

Vincent Granville points out a few flaws in logistic regression: I recently read a very popular article entitled 5 Reasons “Logistic Regression” should be the first thing you learn when becoming a Data Scientist. Here I provide my opinion on why this should no be the case. It is nice to have logistic regression on your […]

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

May 2018
MTWTFSS
« Apr  
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031