When Join Order Matters

Bert Wagner takes a look at one of the lesser appreciated tricks in performance tuning:

I had a great question submitted to me (thank you Brandman!) that I thought would make for a good blog post:

…I’ve been wondering if it really matters from a performance standpoint where I start my queries. For example, if I join from A-B-C, would I be better off starting at table B and then going to A & C?

The short answer: Yes. And no.

One of my favorite query tuning books is SQL Tuning by Dan Tow.  Parts of it are rather dated at this point—like pretty much anything involving a rule-based optimizer—but the gist still works well.  What it comes down to is finding the best single table from which to drive your query (based on table size, filters, etc.) and selecting the appropriate join order afterward.  It’s fairly time-consuming effort, but for the 0.5-1% of queries which really need it, it can be the difference between an awful plan and a good one.

Related Posts

Testing Inline Scalar UDF Performance

Erik Darling whips up a performance test covering scalar UDF changes in SQL Server 2019: This is a slightly different take on yesterday’s post, which is also a common problem I see in queries today. Someone wrote a function to figure out if a user is trusted, or has the right permissions, and sticks it […]

Read More

Making Non-SARGable Queries SARGable with an Index

Denis Gobo violates Betteridge’s Law of Headlines: This question came up the other day from a co-worker, he said he couldn’t change a query but was there a way of making the same query produce a better plan by doing something else perhaps (magic?) He said his query had a WHERE clause that looked like […]

Read More

Categories

November 2017
MTWTFSS
« Oct Dec »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930