Finding Adaptive Join Inefficiencies

Joe Obbish walks us through a scenario with adaptive joins in SQL Server 2017:

The estimated costs for the two queries are very close to each other: 74.6842 and 74.6839 optimizer units. However, we saw earlier that the tipping point for an adaptive join on this query can vary between 22680 and 80388.3 rows. This inconsistency means that we can find a query that performs worse with adaptive joins enabled.

Click through to see the queries Joe is using.  Based on this, I’d guess that this is probably a knife-edge problem:  most of the time, adaptive join processing is better, but if you hit the wrong query, it’s worse.

Related Posts

Clustered Columnstore and Azure SQL DB

Arun Sirpal takes us through online clustered columnstore index creation in Azure SQL Database: What tier do you need to create one of these things? Let’s see. CREATE CLUSTERED  COLUMNSTORE INDEX cciSales ON [SalesLT].[ProductModelProductDescription] WITH ( ONLINE = ON ) But I get this message, Msg 40536, Level 16, State 32, Line 1‘COLUMNSTORE’ is not […]

Read More

Creating a Columnstore Index

Monica Rathbun shows a scenario where creating a clustered columnstore index can make data retrieval much faster: Using AdventureworksDW2016CTP3 we will work with the FactResellerSalesXL table which has 11.6 million rows in it. The simple query we will use as a demo just selects the ProductKey and returns some aggregations grouping them by the different […]

Read More

Categories

October 2017
MTWTFSS
« Sep Nov »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031