Concatenation Truncation

Kevin Feasel

2017-09-29

T-SQL

Adrian Buckman walks through one of the more annoying aspects of building large strings in SQL Server:

So there I was building this massive VARCHAR(MAX) string and concatenated at various points in my code were Database names of the datatype NVARCHAR(128).
The interesting part was that I was expecting SQL server to use my largest data type – the VARCHAR(MAX) and just concatenate the NVARCHAR(128) values into it
this was not the case – what actually happened was my string of  VARCHAR(MAX) characters being truncated down to an NVARCHAR(4000)!

There is a reason for this and its all to do with Data Type Precedence in this case the NVARCHAR is preceding my VARCHAR unless of course I explicitly convert the NVARCHAR to a VARCHAR.

Read the whole thing.

Related Posts

Considerations when Deleting Lots of Data

Ed Elliott takes us through things to think about before deleting a few million rows from a table: FragmentationFragmentation occurs when we delete from pages, and there is still data surrounding our data. If we have 100 rows and delete every odd row, we would have perfect fragmentation in that we have doubled the size […]

Read More

Puzzling Through Older Problems

Kenneth Fisher shares a couple of interview puzzles: The year is 2004. You’re taking a tech test as an interview for a SQL development job. They have a page in their application that displays up to 20 rows of information. They need a piece of code that will return the rows from a given page. […]

Read More

Categories

September 2017
MTWTFSS
« Aug Oct »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930