Mastering Tools

The folks at Sharp Sight Labs explain that future obsolescence of a tool does not mean you should not master it:

The heart of his critique is this: data science is changing very fast, and any tool that you learn will eventually become obsolete.

This is absolutely true.

Every tool has a shelf life.

Every. single. one.

Moreover, it’s possible that tools are going to become obsolete more rapidly than in the past, because the world has just entered a period of rapid technological change. We can’t be certain, but if we’re in a period of rapid technological change, it seems plausible that toolset-changes will become more frequent.

The thing I would tie it to is George Stigler’s paper on information theory.  There’s a cost of knowing—which the commenter notes—but there’s also a cost to search, given the assumption that you know where to look.  Being effective in any role, be it data scientist or anything else, involves understanding the marginal benefit of pieces of information.  This blog post gives you a concrete example of that in the realm of data science.

Related Posts

Using Plotly In Power BI

Kara Annanie shows how you can R integration in Power BI to push Plotly visuals to users: In the example, above, we’ve created a line chart visualization using Plotly and we’ve decided to put labels on the graph, but only on the first and last points of the line graph. This graph would be particularly […]

Read More

P-Hacking and Multiple Comparison Bias

Patrick David has a great article on hypothesis testing, p-hacking, and multiple comparison bias: The most important part of hypothesis testing is being clear what question we are trying to answer. In our case we are asking:“Could the most extreme value happen by chance?”The most extreme value we define as the greatest absolute AMVR deviation from […]

Read More


December 2016
« Nov Jan »