Hive And Impala

Kevin Feasel

2016-10-14

Hadoop

Carter Shanklin and Nita Dembla run a performance comparison of Hive LLAP versus Impala:

Before we get to the numbers, an overview of the test environment, query set and data is in order. The Impala and Hive numbers were produced on the same 10 node d2.8xlarge EC2 VMs. To prepare the Impala environment the nodes were re-imaged and re-installed with Cloudera’s CDH version 5.8 using Cloudera Manager. The defaults from Cloudera Manager were used to setup / configure Impala 2.6.0. It is worth pointing out that Impala’s Runtime Filtering feature was enabled for all queries in this test.

Data: While Hive works best with ORCFile, Impala works best with Parquet, so Impala testing was done with all data in Parquet format, compressed with Snappy compression. Data was partitioned the same way for both systems, along the date_sk columns. This was done to benefit from Impala’s Runtime Filtering and from Hive’s Dynamic Partition Pruning.

I’m impressed with both of these projects.

Related Posts

Mounting HDFS As A Local Filesystem

Guy Shilo looks at two techniques for mounting HDFS as a local filesystem: NFS Gateway is a HDFS component that enables the use to expose HDFS through NFS3 interface so that Linux machines can mount it and access it just as a local filesystem. The manual installation is quite cumbersome and is covered here. Cloudera manager […]

Read More

How Humio Uses Kafka

Kresten Krab describes ways that Humio uses Apache Kafka for their product: Humio is a log analytics system built to run both on-prem and as a hosted offering. It is designed for “on-prem first” because, in many logging use cases, you need the privacy and security of managing your own logging solution. And because volume […]

Read More

Categories

October 2016
MTWTFSS
« Sep Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31