Thoughts On Linked Servers

Dave Mason defends the honor of linked servers:

I seem to be in the minority when it comes to SQL Server linked servers. When it’s another SQL Server instance on the other end, I quite like them for administrative purposes. But other SQL pros have some reservations and gripes. I’ve even seen the word “hate” thrown around freely. Most of the complaints seem to fall into one of these categories: poor performance, insufficient permissions, poorly configured security, and challenges related to remote execution of queries.

I think Dave’s reasoning makes a lot of sense.  Linked servers are not themselves evil.  I think it’s likely a mistake to incorporate them into your mainline application (a mistake I’ve made in the past), but for the kinds of administrative tasks Dave mentions, it’s certainly not a bad idea.

Related Posts

The SQLUndercover Inspector

Adrian Buckman announces the SQLUndercover Inspector: In a Nutshell: The SQLUndercover Inspector is a configurable daily report written in SQL that will send you an email (or log the report to a SQL Table) showing you information about specific parts of SQL Server in HTML format including highlighted warnings/advisory conditions, the report has configurable thresholds […]

Read More

Expanding LVM Drives

David Klee shows how to expand an LVM drive on Linux: Next in our SQL Server on Linux series is one important question. On Windows, if you’re about to run out of space, you get your VM admin / storage admin to expand one or more of your drives, and you go to Disk Management […]

Read More

Categories

August 2016
MTWTFSS
« Jul Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031