Thoughts On Linked Servers

Dave Mason defends the honor of linked servers:

I seem to be in the minority when it comes to SQL Server linked servers. When it’s another SQL Server instance on the other end, I quite like them for administrative purposes. But other SQL pros have some reservations and gripes. I’ve even seen the word “hate” thrown around freely. Most of the complaints seem to fall into one of these categories: poor performance, insufficient permissions, poorly configured security, and challenges related to remote execution of queries.

I think Dave’s reasoning makes a lot of sense.  Linked servers are not themselves evil.  I think it’s likely a mistake to incorporate them into your mainline application (a mistake I’ve made in the past), but for the kinds of administrative tasks Dave mentions, it’s certainly not a bad idea.

Related Posts

New(ish) VLF Status: 4

Paul Randal points out a new VLF status which can appear if you’re using an Availability Group: At least since I started working on the SQL Server team (just after 7.0 shipped) and since then there have only been two VLF status codes: 0 = the VLF is not active (i.e. it can be (re)activated […]

Read More

What sys.dm_exec_query_stats Can Miss

Matthew McGiffen takes us through a scenario where sys.dm_exec_query_stats did not give a complete view of what was running on SQL Server: I got less than 50 rows back so figured I had everything covered, but the total elapsed time across all the queries was less than ten minutes, I knew the server hadn’t been […]

Read More

Categories

August 2016
MTWTFSS
« Jul Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031