Moving Off Of 2005

Erik Darling has a short checklist of some things to check before upgrading SQL Server 2005:

MIND YOUR COMPATIBILITY LEVEL

When going to 2014 (as of today, 2016’s RTM hasn’t been announced yet), you’ll have to decide whether or not the new cardinality estimator suits you. There’s not a cut and dry answer, you’ll have to test it on your workload. If you’d like some of the more modern SQL features added to your arsenal, you can bump yourself up to 2012-levels to get the majority of them.

The interesting survey would be, among people who still have SQL 2005 installations, how many will move as a result of Microsoft declaring end-of-life for 2005.  My expectation is a fairly low percentage—by this point, I figure a at least a strong minority of 2005 instances are around for regulatory or compliance reasons (e.g., some piece of regulated software was certified only for 2005).

Related Posts

Accelerated Database Recovery and Filegroups

Randolph West shows a change to Accelerated Database Recovery in SQL Server 2019 CTP 3.2 and later: ADR makes use of a per-database version store, instead of putting everything in the transaction log and TempDB. In most cases, the payoff more than makes up for valuable transaction log and TempDB storage. In my testing, enabling […]

Read More

Change Tracking in SQL Server

Tim Weigel covers the basics of change tracking in SQL Server: There aren’t a lot of parameters here. You can set change tracking on or off, you can specify your retention period, and you can specify whether to enable auto-cleanup or not. For the retention period, you have the choice of DAYS, HOURS, or MINUTES. […]

Read More

Categories

February 2016
MTWTFSS
« Jan Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29