Press "Enter" to skip to content

Category: T-SQL Tuesday

Application Names and Database Queries

Published 2022-07-12 by Kevin Feasel

Tom Zika does not like those missing application names:

Whenever I’m trying to debug a problem using sp_whoisactive or Extended Events (XE) and I see either Core Microsoft SqlClient Data Provider or .Net SqlClient Data Provider, my blood begins to boil.

It means I’ll probably spend hours asking around to try and find the owner. Sometimes knowing the host_name helps, but there can be a multi-purpose host that runs many applications – which one is having the problem?

How do you set the name? Read the post to find out.

Comments closed

Database Project Versioning and Identification

Published 2022-07-12 by Kevin Feasel

Eitan Blumin answers an important question:

“What is SSDT“, you ask? Oh, you didn’t? Well, let me tell you anyway! SSDT is the go-to solution from Microsoft for versioning SQL Server databases and performing state-based deployments (and it’s free!). It has many useful capabilities for developing and publishing changes from your SQL Database project to your SQL Database in production (or wherever).

One of the things that are not so clear about SSDT specifically and database versioning in general, is how should one identify which “version” of your database project was last deployed to your server?

Eitan includes several ways of tracking and controlling database versions.

Comments closed

Against Tibbling

Published 2022-06-16 by Kevin Feasel

Hugo Kornelis hates tibbling:

Probably the one I hate most. And one that is stubbornly persistent. Object name prefixing.

Or, to be more precise, the standard that enforces that all table names need to start with a prefix that designates them as a table, and all view names with a different prefix to clearly mark them as a view. Typically tbl_ and vw_ are used, though I have also seen just the letters t and v, and I have seen them with or without underscores.

I hate this coding standard (or rather, naming standard) with a vengeance. For a few reasons. The perceived benefit is in fact not a benefit at all. It is detrimental to a quick understanding of what I see on the screen. But my biggest objection is that it negates one of the greatest benefits of views.

Read on to understand why this is a bad idea. I completely agree with Hugo on this.

Comments closed

Coding Standards Writ Large

Published 2022-06-16 by Kevin Feasel

Kenneth Fisher points out the downside of coding standards:

I’m betting you can start to see the problem right? Joe is supporting application A. His team wrote it, and they wrote it using a strict set of coding standards. Jane supports application C. Her team didn’t write it, it was transferred over during the reorg last March. Her team has a set of coding standards they enforce, unfortunately, application C wasn’t written with them. All of their new code is however because their manager wants strict enforcement of their coding standards. Oh, and Joe and Jane are both being moved to be part of a new team next week. They’ll be supporting some older code, that, you guessed it, is using a whole different set of coding standards, if any.

Starting from the Coasean notion of the firm as a means of internalizing externalities and achieving economies of scale + scope, this is just about where you hit the margin for added productivity… Rephrasing this not to be in economist jibber-jabber, this kind of thing is a big part of why really large companies essentially spin off mini-companies and act nearly-independently under the parent company’s umbrella. It’s essentially impossible to create and enforce a meaningful set of standards once you hit a certain threshold of developers, especially when it comes to the more opinion-heavy standards.

Comments closed

Pull Request Standards

Published 2022-06-15 by Kevin Feasel

Deb Melkin stands in front of the gate:

When I think of what my coding standards are, I tend to think of it as how would I review scripts for a pull request (PR). I think my past coworkers can attest that I can get quite picky when I look at code. So if I were your reviewer, what sort of things would I comment on?

Click through for a checklist.

Comments closed

Practical Code Development Standards

Published 2022-06-14 by Kevin Feasel

Tom Zika writes out a list of coding standards:

No magic constants 

WHERE p.ProductType <> 4

What is 4? Just set a variable (constant) from a lookup table. Or write a comment with an explanation.
It’s the least you can do.

Read on for a set of things I generally agree with. This one’s a little bit of a tough case, as in extremely high-performance systems where the cost of a lookup is just too expensive, I’d prefer to use keys rather than values and save the compute cost and possible worse query plan. That said, even in that case, yes, definitely write a comment explaining what 4 is. That said, had I picked any of the other dozen or so recommendations, I wouldn’t have had anything interesting to say other than “go read this.”

2 Comments

Consistency as the Best Coding Rule

Published 2022-06-14 by Kevin Feasel

Kevin Chant values consistency:

Over the years I have worked a lot with automating T-SQL updates across multiple databases. During that time, it has become very clear that both consistency and comments are essential to make the process smooth.

Naming conventions of objects created using T-SQL should be consistent. Along with comments in your code for colleagues or anybody else who picks up your code.

Especially if you are working in a team who want to work in a DevOps related way.

I value consistency a lot but I’ve found I’m too inconsistent to be consistent.

Comments closed

T-SQL Tuesday 150 Round-Up

Published 2022-05-25 by Kevin Feasel

Kenneth Fisher finishes a roundup:

This months subject for T-SQL Tuesday was Your first technical job. I have to say I really really enjoyed reading everyone’s stories and it in a lot of ways made me feel closer to all of you. Thanks for participating!

And of course, if I forgot someone please let me know so I can get them added!

Click through to see everybody’s entries.

Comments closed