Press "Enter" to skip to content

Category: Syntax

Identity Columns And Linked Servers

Published 2018-06-15 by Kevin Feasel

Kenneth Fisher points out an oddity when inserting data across a linked server into a table with an identity column:

So far so good. Now let’s throw in a twist. Let’s call it through a linked server.

INSERT INTO [(local)\sql2014cs].Test.dbo.IdentTest 
	VALUES ('Col1','Col2');

Msg 213, Level 16, State 1, Line 4
Column name or number of supplied values does not match table definition.

Well that’s a bit odd, right? I mean I used that exact command in the previous test. Turns out that when you do an insert across a linked server that identity column is not ignored. Which means we just need to include the identity value right? Nope.

INSERT INTO [(local)\sql2014cs].Test.dbo.IdentTest 
	VALUES (1,'Col1','Col2');

Msg 7344, Level 16, State 1, Line 4
The OLE DB provider “SQLNCLI11” for linked server “(local)\sql2014cs” could not INSERT INTO table “[(local)\sql2014cs].[Test].[dbo].[IdentTest]” because of column “Id”. The user did not have permission to write to the column.

Click through to see how to do this.

Comments closed

There’s Only One Way To Order

Published 2018-05-31 by Kevin Feasel

Matthew McGiffen notes that there is only one way to order, and that is to use the ORDER BY clause:

Everyone, at the beginning of their SQL career, get’s told that it is important to include an ORDER BY if they want the results ordered. Otherwise the order in which they are returned is not guaranteed.

But then you run queries a lot of times that don’t need a specific order – and you see that they (at least seem to) come out in the same order every time. You could (almost) be forgiven for thinking you can rely on that.

There was even a question on a Microsoft SQL certification exam a few years ago that asked what the default order was for records returned by a simple SELECT – the answer it was looking for was that it would be according to the order of the clustered index. So you can rely on that – right?

Wrong. The question was a bad question, and the answer was incorrect. Let’s look at this in action.

Order is never guaranteed to be stable unless you specify a unique ordering using ORDER BY.

Comments closed

Deferred Name Resolution In SQL Server

Published 2018-05-23 by Kevin Feasel

Kendra Little explains the concept of deferred name resolution in SQL Server:

In this case, I’m creating a temporary stored procedure (out of laziness, it means I don’t have to clean up a quick demo) –

CREATE OR ALTER PROCEDURE #test
AS
IF 1=0
    EXECUTE dbdoesnotexist.dbo.someproc;
GO

The database dbdoesnotexist does NOT exist, but I’m still allowed to create the procedure.

When I do so, I get an informational message:

The module ‘#test’ depends on the missing object ‘dbdoesnotexist.dbo.someproc’. The module will still be created; however, it cannot run successfully until the object exists.

This can be useful in some cases where you’ll be querying a table or procedure that may not exist all the time, but which will exist when a certain code block is run.

But, as Kendra points out, deferred name resolution doesn’t work everywhere, so it’s important to know the rules around when it will or will not work.

Comments closed

T-SQL Join Delete

Published 2018-05-18 by Kevin Feasel

Steve Stedman walks us through a bit of T-SQL proprietary syntax:

1
2
3
DELETE t2
FROM [dbo].[Table1] t1
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Table2] t2 on t1.favColor = t2.id;

Names have been changed to protect the innocent.

In the above delete statement which table will have rows deleted from it?

A: Table1

B: Table2

C: Both Table1 and Table2

D: Neither Table1 and Table2

Got it in one.  I like having this syntax available to me when I need it, even though it’s not ANSI standard.

Comments closed

Date And Time Functions To Avoid

Published 2018-05-17 by Kevin Feasel

Randolph West shares his thoughts on three functions he’d rather you avoid:

CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is the ANSI-equivalent of GETDATE(). ANSI is an acronym for the American National Standards Institute, and sometimes vendors will include ANSI functions in their products so they can say that they’re ANSI-compliant (which is not a bad thing, in most cases).

There are three main problems with CURRENT_TIMESTAMP:

  • No brackets. It goes against the rules about functions. So much for standards!
  • It’s functionally equivalent to GETDATE(), which uses DATETIME, which we previously identified is old and bad.
  • It’s too similar to the poorly-named TIMESTAMP data type, which has nothing to do with dates and times and should be called ROWVERSION.

Bottom line: don’t use CURRENT_TIMESTAMP.

At one point I used CURRENT_TIMESTAMP over GETDATE() with the thought of portability in mind.  Since then, my thoughts on code portability have changed and regardless, as Randolph mentions, it’s better to use DATETIME2 functions to avoid precision issues with DATETIME.

Comments closed

Window Functions In WHERE Clauses

Published 2018-04-20 by Kevin Feasel

Shane O’Neill covers an annoying but necessary thing to remember around window functions:

Now, a new learner of SQL comes along with the requirement to find the last 2 rows per PartitionId.

They are diligent and enthusiastic and have just read about Windows Functions. They think to themselves

Wow! This is great! I can do this with Windows Functions!

They also work for a company that has invested in RedGate’s SQL Prompt so they know that they can rely on SQL Prompt to help iron out any inconsistencies in their script.

So they take the SELECT script above and type in WHERE… and the auto complete pops up

And that popup isn’t quite accurate…  Shane covers this in the guise of a SQL Prompt bug, but it’s a good thing to remember regardless of which tooling you use.

Comments closed

Query Tuning With The APPLY Operator

Published 2018-04-09 by Kevin Feasel

Daniel Janik walks through using the APPLY operator to tune a couple of queries:

Recently we were doing a project that heavily focused on query tuning and many tables had various outer joins. My co-worker pointed out that many of these could be converted to an apply rather than a join.

Apply gives you both CROSS and OUTER. Think of CROSS APPLY like an INNER JOIN and OUTER APPLY like an OUTER JOIN.

Let’s compare some code to see how APPLY stacks up.

I like the APPLY operator so much that I created an entire presentation on it.  It’s not a cure-all by any means, but if you understand the intent, you can find places where it improves your code significantly.

Comments closed

Using CONCAT_WS

Published 2018-03-30 by Kevin Feasel

Dave Mason points out another nice addition to the T-SQL toolbelt in SQL Server 2017:

In the last post, I looked at a new T-SQL function for SQL Server 2017. Let’s continue down that path and look at CONCAT_WS(), which is also new for SQL Server 2017. Here’s the definition of the function from Microsoft Docs:

“Concatenates a variable number of arguments with a delimiter specified in the 1st argument. (CONCAT_WS indicates concatenate with separator.)”

Read on for an example using CONCAT_WS.  It’s one of those functions that I haven’t quite committed to memory, but every time I get reminded of it, I remember that I really need to remember it.

Comments closed

Comparing Distinctness

Published 2018-03-28 by Kevin Feasel

Michael J. Swart shows several options for comparing whether an attribute’s value is distinct from a parameter:

Check it:

DECLARE @TeamId bigint = NULL,
    @SubTeamId bigint = NULL;
 
SELECT TOP 1 TaskId
FROM tasks
WHERE assignedTeamId IS NOT DISTINCT FROM @TeamId
  AND assignedSubTeamId IS NOT DISTINCT FROM @SubTeamId

Talk about elegant! That’s what we wanted from the beginning. It’s part of ANSI’s SQL 1999 standard. Paul White tells us it’s implemented internally as part of the query processor, but it’s not part of T-SQL! There’s a connect item for it… err. Or whatever they’re calling it these days. Go read all the comments and then give it a vote. There are lots of examples of problems that this feature would solve.

PROS: Super-elegant!
CONS: Invalid syntax (vote to have it included).

This would be nice to have.  In the meantime, Michael shows several options which are currently valid syntax.

Comments closed