On Disabling Indexes

Kenneth Fisher has a few notes on disabling indexes:

Indexes are probably the number one tool we have to improve performance. That said, there are times when we want to put that index on hold. While indexes dramatically improve read performance they do cause a slight dip in write performance. This isn’t significant most of the time but when doing a large load it can frequently be faster to get rid of the existing indexes and then put them back when you are done.

I don’t think that I’ve ever regularly disabled indexes, even during bulk loading. It’s good to know that the option exists, however.

Related Posts

The (Un)Importance of Index Fragmentation

Tibor Karaszi argues that index fragmentation is a less serious issue than most DBAs think: You know the story. Every week or so, we defragment the indexes. Many of us uses Ola Hallengren’s great script for this, some uses Maintenance Plans, and there are of course other alternatives as well. But are we just wasting […]

Read More

The Performance Hit From Ignoring Duplicate Keys

Paul White explains why there is a big performance hit when using IGNORE_DUP_KEY on clustered indexes: The IGNORE_DUP_KEY index option can be specified for both clustered and nonclustered unique indexes. Using it on a clustered index can result in much poorer performance than for a nonclustered unique index. The size of the performance difference depends on how […]

Read More

Categories

January 2019
MTWTFSS
« Dec Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031