VARCHAR Size And Memory Grant Estimates

Arthur Daniels shows us a good reason for using better data sizes than just VARCHAR(MAX) everywhere:

That’s a lot of desired memory, 1,493,120 KB aka 1.4 GB, but there was only 
25 MB used in the sort. So why was SQL Server so far off the right estimate? It’s the data types we picked.

That’s a lot of memory for a fairly simple query returning 300,000 rows, each containing a string and an int.

Related Posts

Blaming the Right Cardinality Estimator

Arthur Daniels helps us figure out which of SQL Server’s cardinality estimators your query used: SQL Server 2008 is reaching end of support this year, so upgrading your SQL Server might be on your mind. One of the big changes when you upgrade your SQL Servers is upgrading the compatibility level, which by default will […]

Read More

Optimizer Imperfections With Complex Filters

Erik Darling shows a couple examples of how the optimizer will sometimes pick a superior plan when dealing with complicated filters but not always: Sometimes, the optimizer can take a query with a complex where clause, and turn it into two queries. This only happens up to a certain point in complexity, and only if […]

Read More

Categories

January 2019
MTWTFSS
« Dec Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031