Tuning Recommendations In SQL Server 2017

Kendra Little shows that even if you don’t want to use automatic tuning in SQL Server 2017, you can still see the tuning recommendations:

Even though automatic tuning wasn’t enabled, SQL Server picked up on the performance changes. I got a recommendation in sys.dm_db_tuning_recommendations.

  • reason: Average query CPU time changed from 2127.84ms to 66291.9ms
  • state: {“currentValue”:”Active”,”reason”:”AutomaticTuningOptionNotEnabled”}

The details also include the query id in question, and the plan_id of the “fast plan”.

It’s nice to check those out for a couple of weeks before turning automatic tuning on; that way, you can get more comfortable with the types of changes the tuning engine recommends, and if you happen to have a system which is terrible for automatic tuning, you can know that before turning the feature on.

Related Posts

Nested Loops, Hash, Or Merge: Which Is Best?

Grant Fritchey dodges the important questions: First response, also a joke, was the question at the title of this post: What is the preferred operator when joining tables: Hash Match, Nested Loops or Merge? While my immediate response to this question is, yes. Meaning, they’re all preferred, situationally. I decided to expand on that a […]

Read More

Parallelism Strategies For Grouping Operations

Itzik Ben-Gan continues his series on grouping data in SQL Server by looking at how these operations can go parallel: Besides needing to choose between various grouping and aggregation strategies (preordered Stream Aggregate, Sort + Stream Aggregate, Hash Aggregate), SQL Server also needs to choose whether to go with a serial or a parallel plan. […]

Read More

Categories

April 2018
MTWTFSS
« Mar May »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30