Writing A Better Abstract

Kevin Feasel

2017-03-27

R

Adnan Fiaz reviews conference abstracts for patterns:

Certainly an interesting graph! It may have been better to show the proportions instead of counts as the number of abstracts in each category are not equal. Nevertheless, the conclusion remains the same. The words “r” and “data” are clearly the most common. However, what is more interesting is that abstracts in the “yes” category use certain words significantly more often than abstracts in the “no” category and vice versa (more often because a missing bar doesn’t necessarily mean a zero observation). For example, the words “science”, “production” and “performance” occur more often in the “yes” category. Vice versa, the words “tools”, “product”, “package” and “company(ies)” occur more often in the “no” category. Also, the word “application” occurs in its singular form in the “no” category and in its plural form in the “yes” category. Certainly, at EARL we like our applications to be plural, it is in the name after all.

Granted, this is only abstracts for one conference, but it’s an interesting idea.

Related Posts

Visualizing with Heatmaps in R

Anisa Dhana shows how you can create a quick heatmap plot in R: To give your own colors use the scale_fill_gradientn function.ggplot(dat, aes(Age, Race)) + geom_raster(aes(fill = BMI)) + scale_fill_gradientn(colours=c("white", "red")) This is a quick example using ggplot2 but there are other heatmap libraries available too.

Read More

Predicting Intermittent Demand

Bruno Rodrigues shows one technique for forecasting intermittent data: Now, it is clear that this will be tricky to forecast. There is no discernible pattern, no trend, no seasonality… nothing that would make it “easy” for a model to learn how to forecast such data. This is typical intermittent demand data. Specific methods have been […]

Read More

Categories

March 2017
MTWTFSS
« Feb Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031