Aborting Index Rebuilds

Arun Sirpal shows how to use the ABORT_AFTER_WAIT attribute on an index rebuild command:

Looking into the locking you will see that ONLINE operation uses (Sch-M) on the corresponding table as part of the process (actually takes Shared Table Lock (S) at the beginning of the operation, and a Schema Modification Lock (Sch-M at the end)).

So to be granted a SCH-M lock you can’t have any conflicting locks, so what happens when / if you have a process that is updating the table and you want to use the ONLINE rebuild? Yes you will be blocked. With 2014 onwards we can control what happens if we get into this situation and for this post I am going to abort the other query causing me to wait.

Not sure I like the “Kick the other guy(s) off” part that much, but I can see uses.  It’s probably more likely to go the opposite route, cancelling the rebuild if the server’s too hot.

Related Posts

Oddity With User Write Count In dm_db_index_usage_stats

Shaun J. Stuart looks at an oddity with the user_updates column on sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats: This pulls both reads and writes from the sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats dynamic management view. A read is defined as either a seek, scan, or lookup and a write is defined as an update. All seemed good until I noticed something strange. One of the top written to tables was, based on our naming convention, a […]

Read More

Safely Dropping Databases

Bob Pusateri notes a little issue when it comes to dropping databases: At a previous employer, we had a well-defined process when dropping databases for a client. It went something like this: Confirm in writing the databases on which servers/instances to be dropped Take a final full backup of databases Take databases offline Wait at […]

Read More

Categories

October 2016
MTWTFSS
« Sep Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31