COUNT Versus EXISTS

Kevin Feasel

2016-09-19

Syntax

Lukas Eder explains COUNT versus EXISTS:

COUNT(*) needs to return the exact number of rows. EXISTS only needs to answer a question like:

“Are there any rows at all?”

In other words, EXISTS can short-circuit after having found the first matching row. If your client code (e.g. written in Java or in PL/SQL, or any other client language) needs to know something like:

“Did actors called “Wahlberg” play in any films at all?”

Lukas shows how it works in Oracle and Postgres; the result is still basically the same for SQL Server.

Related Posts

Refreshing Views After DDL Changes

Eduardo Pivaral shows how you can refresh the metadata for a view in SQL Server after one of its underlying tables or functions changes: So we proceed to execute an alter view over the first view: ALTER VIEW dbo.[vi_invoices_received_by]ASSELECT ConfirmedReceivedBy as [Received by], COUNT(InvoiceID) as [# of Invoices], CustomerIDFROM Sales.InvoicesGROUP BY ConfirmedReceivedBy, CustomerID;GO So we […]

Read More

Order of Execution on SELECT Expressions

Bert Wagner digs into an interesting topic: Success! But as I was celebrating my dynamic SQL victory, I realized I was making an assumption about SQL Server that I had never thought about before: The above query only works because SQL Server is executing the variables in the SELECT list sequentially. I’m incrementing @CurrentRow only after processing […]

Read More

Categories

September 2016
MTWTFSS
« Aug Oct »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930