Availability Groups And Failover Cluster Instances

Derik Hammer digs into a more complex architecture for HA+DR:

The Availability Group will handle the data synchronization between the data centers. Asynchronous mode is recommend due to potential network latency hindering primary site performance. With the combination of these two features, you meet HA with the FCI’s automatic failover locally and DR with manual failover of the Availability Group between sites.

Derik’s conclusion is important:  this isn’t the type of thing a brand new accidental DBA should try to build; there are a lot of moving parts here.  But if you want a robust solution and have the support people available to handle the relative complexity, this is a good option.

Related Posts

Simplified Disaster Recovery With dbatools

Chrissy LeMaire shows how you can make DR a lot easier with dbatools: When we talk about Disaster Recovery or DR, it’s often coupled with the term High Availability or HA. Here are some definitions from my graduate course on HADR. high availability Deals with minor outages, and failover solutions are automated The goal is to restore full […]

Read More

New(ish) VLF Status: 4

Paul Randal points out a new VLF status which can appear if you’re using an Availability Group: At least since I started working on the SQL Server team (just after 7.0 shipped) and since then there have only been two VLF status codes: 0 = the VLF is not active (i.e. it can be (re)activated […]

Read More

Categories

February 2016
MTWTFSS
« Jan Mar »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29